by John Moe // Posted: 09/09/10 05:39 PM
I figured that was a better headline that “Apple chairman calls for a higher standard for app approval”. Same thing.
"We have over 250,000 apps in the App Store. We don’t need any more Fart apps"
(No fart-related YouTube clip here. Even I have a little shame.)
Posted: 09/02/10 11:40 AM
By Steve Henn
Microsoft is released its latest mobile phone software to cell phone manufactures today.
Windows 7 is Microsofts’ latest crack at getting back into the mobile game. And the Redmond Washington company is desperate. Its market-share in smart phones is almost non-existent – while its rivals Google and Apple both claim to be adding more than 200,000 new mobile users every day.
by John Moe // Posted: 07/23/10 11:10 AM
Yesterday, we brought news of all Microsoft employees being given free Windows 7 Phones when the late entry to the smart phone war debuts later this year (I’ve seen October for a launch or as late as December). Now Seattle-based tech blog Tech Flash is publishing an internal memo detailing some of the strings attached.
They want employees to evangelize the product to friends, sure, but they’d also like those employees to build apps for the phone. This news comes not long after the company began paying developers to build apps for the store. It’s a little gaudy, sure, perhaps even a touch desperate but MSFT is in a massive game of catch up here trying to be a legit player in an already crowded smart phone marketplace where the number of app offerings matter a lot. But they did it before with Xbox so we’ll just have to see.
by John Moe // Posted: 05/14/10 05:26 PM
A smart phone sold only through Google! Not available in stores!
But I guess that’s when they thought more people would buy it. Because now it’s on to Plan B.
by John Moe // Posted: 04/22/10 12:23 PM
Well, not court indictments. Not yet anyway. But John Gruber of Daring Fireball presents his case quite strongly. A good long read and this toward the end:
Second, publishing the name, photographs, and personal information of the Apple engineer who lost the phone is irrelevant to the story. It was the dick move to end all dick moves. Gizmodo is, ostensibly, a gadget site. The interest of their readers in this saga regards the phone. Publishing his name did not clarify in the least bit how they obtained the phone. The people whose identities I’d like to know are those who obtained and then sold the phone, not the guy from Apple who lost it. There is no interest served by outing him other than taking sociopathic glee in making a public spectacle of someone who made a very serious but honest mistake.
I think we’ve seen this whole case/story/kerfuffle become something of a blind men and the elephant situation. A lot of people I’ve talked to take the same perspective as my wife does, which is “Oh that poor guy! What a mess!”
I’ve seen friends on Facebook take a kind of pleasure in what they see as a giant (Apple) being taken down a few notches by human imperfection. Curious that Apple, the alt brand, is now seen as just as much of a monolith as Microsoft used to be. A few folks I’ve heard are happy to see a blog get away with something sneaky.
The one point of view I’ve seen very little of is discussion of the device itself. “Front facing camera? Separate volume buttons? Yeah, well, whatever. But what kind of beer was the guy drinking that night?!” I wonder if Apple as an idea is bigger than any idea they create.
by John Moe // Posted: 04/21/10 05:21 PM
Apple’s iPhone business, which didn’t exist three years ago, now represents a whopping 40% of the company’s revenue, and has been the company’s biggest revenue generator for three quarters in a row.
$5.4 billion in annual revenue with 124% growth over last year. Holy smokes.